Category Archives: Journal Club

Will TurboQuant save us from the RAM apocalypse?

The LLM boom is causing a global shortage of the very same computer memory it needs to sustain itself. Reports suggest OpenAI’s Stargate project alone could consume up to 40% of global DRAM output. Frontier labs like Google DeepMind need to make their models more memory-efficient.


One such technique is TurboQuant, released by Google. TurboQuant is an example of an online “quantisation” method. LLMs represent information using large tensors of numerical values, where each number typically uses 64 or 32 bits. However, many values do not require full numerical precision, so we can “round” them using fewer bits and less memory. We can see this in the example below:

The rounded value now requires 4x less memory. Source

Some quantisation methods are applied offline before inference begins. TurboQuant is ‘online’ because it compresses the KV cache dynamically during inference.

Continue reading →

Fragment-to-Lead Successes in 2024 – 10th Anniversary Edition

In what I have to admit is now becoming an annual tradition ([2023] [2019]), I’d like to highlight the 2024 edition of the fragment-to-lead success stories, published in J. Med. Chem. at the end of 2025 [Paper].

Continue reading →

Fragment-to-Lead Successes in 2023

Back in 2021, I highlighted the annual fragment-to-lead (F2L) success stories from 2019 [Blog post] [Paper]. This is one of my favourite annual publications, and I’m delighted to see that it’s still going strong. In this post, I’ll discuss the 2023 edition that was published in at the start of 2025 [Paper].

Continue reading →

How to write a review paper as a first year PhD student

As a first year PhD student, it is not an uncommon thing to be asked to write a review paper on your subject area. It is both a great way to get acquainted with your research field and to get the background portion of your thesis completed early. However, it can seem like a daunting task to go from knowing almost nothing about your research field to producing something of interest for experts who have spent years studying your subject matter.

In my first year, I was exactly in this position and I found very little online to help guide this process. Thus, here is my reflective look at writing a review paper that will hopefully help someone else in the future.

Continue reading →

The evolution, evolvability and engineering of gene regulatory DNA

Catching up on the literature is one of the highlights of my job as a scientist. True, sometimes you can be overwhelmed by the amount of information you don’t have; or wonder if we really need another paper showing that protein-ligand scoring functions don’t work. And yet, sometimes you find excellent research that you can’t but regard with a mixture of awe and envy. At a recent group meeting, I discussed one such paper from the research group of Aviv Regev at MIT, where the authors perform an impressive combination of computation and experiment to consider some basic questions in gene regulation and evolution. Here is why I think it’s excellent.

The authors are interested in promoters, small sequences of DNA that precede genes, which are known to regulate how frequently their partners will be expressed. In short, these promoters are binding sites for transcription factors, a family of proteins that in turn recruit RNA polymerase to transcribe DNA to RNA. In turn, albeit not directly, the rate of gene transcription determines the rate at which a protein is produced. If this sounds simple, however, that is where our understanding stops. The human genome encodes some 1.6k different transcription factors (~6-7% of protein-coding genes) and their underworkings are still not well-understood.

Continue reading →

A handful of lesser known python libraries

There are more python libraries than you can shake a stick at, but here are a handful that don’t get much love and may save you some brain power, compute time or both.

Fire is a library which turns your normal python functions into command-line utilities without requiring more than a couple of additional lines of copy-and-paste code. Being able to immediately access your functions from the command line is amazingly helpful when you’re making quick and dirty utilities and saves needing to reach for the nuclear approach of using getopt.

Continue reading →

The Smallest Allosteric System

Allostery is still a badly understood but very general mechanism in the protein world. In principle, an allosteric event occurs when a ligand (small or big) binds to a certain site of a protein and something (activity or function) changes at a different, distant site. A well-known example would be G-protein-coupled receptors that transport such an allosteric signal even across a membrane. But it does not have to be that far apart. As part of the Protein Folding and Dynamics series, I have recently watched a talk by Peter Hamm (Zurich) who presented work on an allosteric system that I thought was very interesting because it was small and most importantly, controllable.

PDZ domains are peptide-binding domains, often part of multi-domain proteins. For the work presented the researchers used the PDZ3 domain which is a bit special and has an additional (third) C-terminal α-helix (α3-helix) which is packing to the other side of the binding pocket. Previous work (Petit et al. 2009) had shown that removal of the α3-helix had changed ligand affinity but not PDZ structure, major changes were of an entropic nature instead. Peter Hamm’s group linked an azobenzene-derived photoswitch to that α3-helix; in its cis configuration stabilizing the α3-helix and destabilising in trans (see Figure 1).

Figure 1: PDZ3 domain (purple) and photoswitch (red) have different affinities for the peptide ligand (green), depending on the photoswitch’s isomerisation state (and temperature). From Bozovic, O., Jankovic, B. & Hamm, P. Sensing the allosteric force. Nat Commun 11, 5841 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19689-7
Continue reading →