Tag Archives: conference feedback

ISMB/ECCB conference feedback 

The ISMB/ECCB conference took place in Liverpool this year. So, a couple of OPIGlets took the train up north to attend this biyearly joint conference. Here we will give some general feedback on the conference and highlight some interesting talks/posters. 

General feedback 

ISMB/ECCB is a 4.5 day conference starting on the Sunday evening and running until Thursday evening. The conference is attended by around 2500 people, mostly from academic groups around the world. With more than 20 different tracks, it is a broad conference with lots of tracks happening at the same time. As always, it is thus recommended to have a look at the schedule beforehand to not get too overwhelmed. Each day there is one keynote, two poster sessions, and three blocks of talks. These talks are often given by PIs, but also PostDocs and PhD students get the opportunity to present. There are also some smaller slots for highlighting posters which are presented that day. 

This year there was a very interesting line-up of Distinguished Keynote speakers. The conference was kicked off by John Jumper talking about AlphaFold2, with a focus on how the team went about the various problems during the process of going from the initial AlphaFold model to AlphaFold2. On Monday Prof. Amos Bairoch talked about biocuration and importance and challenges of public databases. He discussed the FAIR principles for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable for data management [1]. The next Keynote was by Prof. James Zou about computational biology in the age of AI agents (later more). On Wednesday we had our own Prof. Charlotte Deane (woo!) talking about structure-based drug discovery with a focus on the importance of baselines and benchmarking. The conference was ended by a short interview with Prof. David Baker, followed by a talk from Prof. Fabian Theis on decoding cellular systems. He discussed Cellflow [2], an AI tool that predicts how perturbations like drugs effect the cellular phenotype. 

Continue reading →

An insight into mega-conferences – attending ESCMID Global 2025

I suppose it really hit me when the Viennese border control officer asked, “Ah, you must be here for the conference?” That’s when I realised: this wasn’t just any event. ESCMID Global isn’t your average gathering of lab coat enthusiasts, but rather one of the largest clinical infectious disease conferences in the world. Over 16,000 attendees packed into Vienna for their 35th annual congress.

So, was flying across Europe to attend the Glastonbury of conferences, minus the mud, plus the microbes, worth it?

Well… it depends on what you’re hoping to get out of it. If you’re an academic, you might find that a lot of the sessions lean heavily towards the clinical side of things. On the plus side, it made it easier to narrow down my schedule – with over a dozen sessions happening at any one time, a bit of decisiveness goes a long way. Personally, I found the big-name, high-level keynotes and annual updates from organisations like EUCAST the most accessible and informative.

Continue reading →

ISMB 2022 – July 10-14 Madison, Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, a place known for its superb selection of craft beverages, for having Wisconsin’s Best Cheese Curds, and, most importantly, for hosting the 2022 annual international conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB). Fortunately, we (Lewis and Tobias) got to attend this year’s ISMB and get a taste of Madison. The 2022 conference is the 30th ISMB conference and has grown to become the world’s largest bioinformatics/computational biology conference with nearly 600 presented talks. We therefore got to hear a wide range of different and interesting talks.

Continue reading →

Antibodies as Drugs: Keystone Symposia

Between the 27th April and 1st of May, I was very fortunate to be able attend the Antibodies as Drugs Keystone Symposium and give my first conference talk internationally, in which I spoke about the methods our group has developed for using structure to make predictions about where an antibody binds relative to other antibodies. This included paratyping [1], Ab-Ligity [2] and most recently SPACE [3].

I will preface this by saying that lots of the work people spoke about was unpublished, which was so exciting, but makes for a difficult blog post to write. To avoid any possibility of putting my foot in my mouth I will keep the science very surface level. The conference was held at the Keystone resort in Colorado, and the science combined with a kind of landscape I have never experienced before made for an extremely cool experience. This meeting was originally combined with a protein design meeting, and the two were split by COVID – this meant that in-silico methods were the minority in the program, but I didn’t mind that as the computational work that was presented was quite diverse so it was definitely a good representation of the field still. I also really enjoyed the large number of infectious disease talks in which we got a good range of the major human pathogens – ebolaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 of course, dengue, hantaviruses, metapneumovirus, HIV, TB and malaria all featured. The bispecific session was another highlight for me. The conference was very well organised and I liked how we were all asked to share a fun fact about ourselves – one speaker shared that he is a Christmas tree farmer in his spare time (I won’t share his name in case he is keeping that under wraps). That made me reconsider how fun I can truly consider myself…

Without turning this into a travel blog, I also want to add that Keystone was insanely beautiful and make you look at some pics I got. 

We got to experience snow
Continue reading →