{"id":374,"date":"2013-03-12T14:02:48","date_gmt":"2013-03-12T14:02:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blopig.com\/blog\/?p=374"},"modified":"2013-03-12T14:02:48","modified_gmt":"2013-03-12T14:02:48","slug":"journal-club-protein-structure-model-refinement-using-fragment-guided-md","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.blopig.com\/blog\/2013\/03\/journal-club-protein-structure-model-refinement-using-fragment-guided-md\/","title":{"rendered":"Journal Club: Protein structure model refinement using fragment-guided MD"},"content":{"rendered":"

For this week’s journ<\/span>al club I presented <\/span>this<\/a>\u00a0paper by Jian <\/span>et al\u00a0<\/em>from the <\/span>Zhang Lab<\/a>. The paper tackles the problem of refining protein structure models using molecular dynamics (MD)<\/a>.
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

The most successful protocols for building protein structure models have been template-based methods<\/a>. These involve selecting whole or parts of known protein structures and assembling them to form an initial model of the target sequence of interest. This initial model can then be altered or refined to (hopefully) achieve higher accuracy. One method to make these adjustments is to use\u00a0molecular dynamics simulations to sample different conformations of the structure. A “refined” model can then be taken as a low-energy\u00a0state that the simulation converges to.\u00a0<\/span>H<\/span>owever, whilst physics-based potentials are effective for certain aspects of refinement (e.g. relieving clashes between side chain atoms), the task of actually improving overall model quality has so far proved to be too ambitious.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The Method<\/strong><\/p>\n

In this paper entitled “Atomic-Level Protein Structure Refinement Using Fragment-Guided Molecular Dynamics Conformation Sampling<\/strong>,” Jian et al<\/em>\u00a0demonstrate that current MD refinement methods have little guarantee of making any improvement to the accuracy of the model. They therefore introduce a technique of supplementing physics-based potentials with knowledge about fragments of structures that are similar to the protein of interest.<\/span><\/p>\n

The method works by using the initial model to search for similar structures within the PDB. \u00a0These are found using two regimes. The first is to search for global templates by assessing the TMscore of structures to the whole initial model. T<\/span>he second is to search for fragments of structures by dividing the initial model into continuous 3 secondary structure elements. From these sets of templates and the initial model, the authors can generate a bespoke potential for the model based on the distances between\u00a0C\u03b1 atoms. By doing this, additional information about the likely global topology of the protein can be incorporated into a molecular dynamics simulation. The authors claim that this enables the MD energy landscape is therefore reshaped from being “golf-course-like” being “funnel-like”. \u00a0Essentially, the MD simulations are guided to sample conformations which are likely (as informed by the fragments) to be close to the target protein structure.\u00a0<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

\"Abstract\"

A schematic of the FG-MD refinement procedure<\/p><\/div>\n

\u00a0Does it work?<\/strong><\/p>\n

As a full solution to the problem of protein structure model refinement, the results are far from convincing. Quality measures<\/a> show improvement in only the second or third decimal place from the initial model to the refined model. Also, as might be expected, the degree to which the model quality is improved is dependent on the accuracy of the initial of the model.<\/p>\n

However, what is important about this paper is that, although small, the improvements made do<\/em> exist in a systematic fashion. Previously, attempts to refine a model using MD not only failed to improve its accuracy but would be likely to reduce its quality. Fragment-guided MD (FG-MD) <\/a>and the explicit inclusion of a hydrogen bonding potential, is not only able to improve the conformations of side chains but also improve (or at least not destroy) the global backbone topology of a model.<\/p>\n

\"Dependence<\/a>

Dependence of the energy of a model on its TM-Score to the native structure. In black is the energy as measure using the AMBER99 energy function. In grey is the corresponding funnel-like shape of the FG-MD energy function.<\/p><\/div>\n

This paper therefore lays the groundwork for the development of further refinement methods that incorporate the knowledge from protein structure fragments with atomically detailed energy functions. Given that the success of the method is related to the accuracy of the initial model, there may be scope for developing similar techniques to refine models of specific proteins where modelling quality is already good.\u00a0e.g. antibodies.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

For this week’s journal club I presented this\u00a0paper by Jian et al\u00a0from the Zhang Lab. The paper tackles the problem of refining protein structure models using molecular dynamics (MD). The most successful protocols for building protein structure models have been template-based methods. These involve selecting whole or parts of known protein structures and assembling them […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","wikipediapreview_detectlinks":true,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[489],"class_list":["post-374","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-groupmeetings"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"authors":[{"term_id":489,"user_id":10,"is_guest":0,"slug":"james","display_name":"James Dunbar","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7dbfd5f8cfa0385032a6b9d425335f52669ae5d89e784a5e65c14ecfe7dbea14?s=96&d=mm&r=g","0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blopig.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blopig.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blopig.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blopig.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blopig.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=374"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.blopig.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":393,"href":"https:\/\/www.blopig.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374\/revisions\/393"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blopig.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=374"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blopig.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=374"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blopig.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=374"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blopig.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=374"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}